 | |
Leaders from ten prominent civil rights, women and minority
interest organizations have been making the rounds meeting with FCC
Commissioners asking them to reverse 2006 rule changes that, since
adopted, have virtually eliminated the ability of small and minority
businesses to compete against large wireless companies for valuable
spectrum at FCC auctions. The groups are concerned about two aspects of
the FCC auction rules designed to give small businesses with limited
assets and revenue, (called designated entities or DEs) a reasonable
chance to bid for and win spectrum at auctions where they have to
compete with large wireless companies. Before the changes, DEs were
able to raise capital, secure spectrum at a discount and operate
successful wireless companies. However, in 2006, without warning or
opportunity for public comment, the FCC changed the rules shortly
before it auctioned off prime and valuable spectrum in the Advanced
Wireless Service auction (Auction 66). Between 1996 and 2005, DEs'
average successful participation rate in comparable wireless auctions
was over 70% compared to only 4% in Auction 66 and 2.6% in Auction 73
(a subsequent auction). After these changes, of the $19 billion of
licenses sold in Auction 73 last year, minorities acquired just $5
million, or less than 1% of the total value of those licenses.
The
agency made two changes in 2006. First, it increased the time DEs must
hold the licenses (or face having to repay the government the value of
the discount) from five years to ten. Second, it required DEs to
provide retail wireless service with at least half of the spectrum won
at auction. The problem with these "fixes" is that they had the effect
of sabotaging the very small businesses the DE rules aim to help.
Investors, who had been comfortable investing in the DEs, found 10
years to be too long to commit funds without a reasonable exit option.
The lease restriction foreclosed the only viable means small businesses
can compete in a field where 90% of the wireless market is controlled
by the top four wireless companies. A startup usually can offer service
at first only by leasing or wholesaling a substantial part of their
winning spectrum. Competition by a startup in the retail wireless
marketplace is virtually impossible. The FCC said when it adopted the
changes that it was seeking to curb perceived abuse to the DE discount,
however, it cited no evidence of fraud when it made those changes.
Last
June, this public interest coalition, joined with six small wireless
businesses that complained the rule change curtailed their chances to
compete, and filed an Amicus Curiae Brief with the U.S. Court of
Appeals for The Third Circuit. Their brief supported a challenge to the
rule changes made by Council Tree Communications, Inc., Bethel Native
Corporation and the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council.
In the meetings, held separately with Acting FCC Chairman Michael Copps and Commissioners Jonathan Adelstein and Robert McDowell,
the coalition asked the Commission to immediately repeal the changes
going forward, a course that would reflect the new Administration's
emphasis on diversity and competition.
During a meeting with Chairman Copps on Tuesday, Kimberly Marcus,
Executive Director of the Public Policy Institute for the Rainbow PUSH
Coalition, relayed the concern of her organization and its founder and
president, the Reverend Jesse L. Jackson, Sr. "We are
worried that the absence of small, minority and women winners in
Auctions 66 and 73 demonstrates a real problem with the current rules,"
Marcus said. "New entrants need to be able to compete effectively
against incumbent companies in this consolidated industry and these
rules unreasonably and discriminately handicap DEs."
Cheryl Leanza,
Managing Director of The United Church of Christ, Office of
Communication, who was also present in the meeting with Chairman Copps,
said, "We recognize the Commission's real need to prevent abuse, but we
are concerned that the new rules seem to have eliminated DEs from the
auction winners circle."
Inez Gonzalez,
Vice President for Media Policy for the National Hispanic Media
Coalition, who also attended the meeting, said that her group joined
the coalition to make sure that Latino businesses are given a fair
chance to raise capital. "If the consequence of the rules is that
Latino and other minority businesses can't do that, it only makes sense
that they are rescinded," Gonzalez said.
Jeneba Ghatt,
counsel for the Amici organizations, also represented Georgetown
University Law Center's Institute for Public Representation at the
meeting, said she agreed that the rule change and its consequences has
amounted to what one of the meeting participants called a case of "the
remedy killing the patient."
Angela Ciccolo,
Interim General Counsel for the National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People, who attended the meeting with
Commissioner McDowell, asked the Commissioner to consider the negative
consequence of the rules on the NAACP's constituencies that use
advanced wireless technologies to receive news, information,
entertainment and participate in the political process -- in essence
the new broadcast medium. "It would only make sense to immediately
reverse this damaging trend and to delete those two changes from the
books as soon as possible," Ciccolo said. "The NAACP is very concerned
that minorities and women-owned businesses, most of which qualify as
DEs, not continue to be burdened by the rules, especially given the
need to prepare for upcoming auctions."
National Organization for Women President, Kim Gandy,
emphasized to Commissioner Adelstein that NOW was particularly
concerned that during Auction 73, women-owned businesses won zero
licenses. "If the Commission is going to advance President Obama's
interest in removing artificial barriers to access for opportunities to
traditionally disadvantaged businesses, including minorities and women,
the FCC would have to act now and act fast to reverse those rule
changes."
PRESS CONTACT:
JJ Ghatt, JJ Ghatt Public Relations LLC
2 Wisconsin Circle, Suite 700, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815
(240) 235-5028 jj@ghatt.com
SOURCE National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People; Rainbow PUSH Coalition; National Organization for
Women Foundation; Asian American Justice Center; Media Alliance; Office
of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc.; Benton
Foundation; National Hispanic Media Coalition; National Indian
Telecommunications Institute; Women?s Institute for Freedom of the Press |