The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the government entity that
manages the commercial and public radio spectrum in the United States,
has proposed making 500 megahertz of spectrum available for broadband
within the next 10 years of which 300 MHz between 225 MHz and 3.7 GHz
will likely be made available for mobile use within five years. The
extra bandwidth, recaptured from broadcasters after the digital
television transition, is certainly needed, given that AT&T reports
that its mobile broadband traffic has increased 5000 percent over the
last three years and that other carriers have also seen significant
growth. However, under the current approach to allocating spectrum, this
500 MHz will do little to ease the looming spectrum crunch.
It’s time to rethink the way we allocate spectrum. Under current
regulations, spectrum real estate is valuable but exclusive. In the
past, that exclusivity was the only way to prevent multiple users from
interfering with each other. But advances in radio technology means that
today such exclusivity is no longer necessary; instead, it creates
false scarcity. So we must change our decades-old approach to managing
the public airwaves.
When the FCC began allocating spectrum in the 1930s,
radios required wide swaths of spectrum to communicate. Without single
players occupying designated bands, a cacophony of interference would
have destroyed audio fidelity and later, with television, picture
quality.
Today radios that can share spectrum make such protections from
interference unnecessary. Just as car drivers can change lanes to avoid
congestion, these "smart radios," also called "cognitive radios," are
transceivers that listen to available frequencies and communicate over
any channels that are currently unused. These radios not only shift
frequencies but can also be programmed with the necessary protocols for
use in different bands, such as for speaking the "language" of various
blocks of spectrum used for Wi-Fi, television, or cellphones. This means
that vast swaths of spectrum no longer need be locked into single use,
or left unused, as a hedge against interference.
Unfortunately, the FCC’s policies still assume the use of antiquated
technology, and therefore that license holders must maintain absolute
control of spectrum space at all times. These regulations must be
updated to reflect the technological realities of smart radios.
Wi-Fi
serves as a striking example of what is possible. A relatively
narrow piece of the airwaves that’s open for unlicensed access, Wi-Fi
has enabled home networking, roaming connectivity in hotels, cafes, and
airplanes, and community broadband networks around the world. The
explosion of communications in Wi-Fi’s 2.4 and 5 gigahertz frequencies
has led to a host of new services and applications. However, these
frequencies have trouble with walls, hills, and long distances. To
support next-generation networking, a logical next step would be to
allow technology developers access to a bigger and better swath of
unlicensed wireless spectrum through the use of smart radios.
Policy allowing these new radios, tagged Opportunistic Spectrum Access
(OSA), would give birth to a new generation of connectivity. With smart
radios, unlicensed devices could share the same bandwidth as licensed
users, finding unused frequencies in real time and filling in during the
milliseconds when licensed users are not using their bands. In essence,
they would work the same way as today’s iTrip or many home wireless
phones, which scan a number of different channels and choose the one
with the least interference.
Developers working on smart radio devices are excited about the
possibilities of OSA. The technology allows for more affordable
broadband for rural populations where low population density has
deterred private infrastructure investment. It would mean more
affordable and robust networking over longer ranges than today’s Wi-Fi,
helping municipalities working to update aging communications systems
and public safety officials working in both urban and remote areas.
Similarly, OSA could increase opportunities for wireless Internet
service providers and networking in businesses, universities, and
cities. Successful community wireless networks including
Urbana-Champaign, Illinois; Athens, Greece; and Dharamsala, India, could
be expanded over greater distances.
The great benefit of OSA is the ability to open more access to spectrum
while avoiding the challenges of moving current users to other bands.
For example, smart radio device developers could access unused
frequencies in the so-called white spaces of broadcast television. These
white spaces, created when the FCC allocated spectrum to television
broadcasters, are empty channels that were left unoccupied to prevent
interference. In many rural areas, as much as 80 percent of this
television spectrum is currently unused.
Today companies like Spectrum Bridge and Shared Spectrum Co. are already
building next-generation networks using OSA. Spectrum Bridge has built a
prototype network using TV frequencies in Claudville, Va. And Shared
Spectrum has developed OSA technologies for use in battlefield
communications, using these devices’ frequency-hopping capabilities to
help avoid jamming efforts by hostile forces.
The FCC recognizes that this spectrum could be made available. In 2008
it issued an order authorizing the use of "White Space Devices (WSDs)
that can detect TV signals at levels that are 1/1000th the signal power a
television needs to display a picture, scan for interference, and move
their bandwidth accordingly, avoiding interference with television
broadcasts." To date, however, rollout of such products has stalled
because the FCC has not followed through with necessary supplemental
rulings, such as creating the required geolocational database of
spectrum assignments to help identify which frequencies are in use in
each area. Meanwhile, as a part of the national broadband plan, the FCC
has committed to repurposing TV bands for exclusive use.
Potential spectrum also exists outside the television bands. Most
spectrum allocations, such as the 270 000 held by government agencies
alone, are woefully underutilized. Based on the best available data,
collected in 2004 as part of a National Science Foundation research
project, less than 10 percent of our current spectrum is used at any
given point in time (including in major cities).
If the FCC continues the
current policies of restricting spectrum use to exclusive entities and
the highest bidders, they will continue choking what FCC Chairman Julius
Genachowski has called "the oxygen of mobile broadband service." By
adopting OSA policies, the FCC will allow expansive access to spectrum
without disrupting existing users. Current license holders could
preserve priority use in their assigned bands, but secondary users could
communally use the 90 percent of spectrum that is typically not in
active use.
At this point, implementing OSA is a policy consideration, not a
technological challenge. In the National Broadband Plan released by the
FCC in March, the commission recommends expeditiously completing the
regulations related to TV white spaces. In our view, these rulings must
be expanded to include a greater spread of underused spectrum. Spectrum
will always be a finite resource, but policy needs to evolve alongside
the technology to increase the efficiency and number of devices that can
take advantage of this public resource.
About the
Authors
James Losey is a program associate with the New America Foundation’s
Open Technology Initiative. Most recently he has published articles in Slate as
well as resources on federal broadband stimulus opportunities and
analyses of the National Broadband Plan.
Sascha Meinrath is the director of the New America Foundation’s Open
Technology Initiative and has been described as a community Internet
pioneer and an entrepreneurial visionary. He is a well-known expert on
community wireless networks, municipal broadband, and telecommunications
policy and was the 2009 recipient of the Public Knowledge IP3 Award for
excellence in public interest advocacy.