 | |
LOS ANGELES (March 26, 2012) -- The
nation's
dominant provider of radio audience metrics has agreed to settle a
consumer
protection lawsuit jointly pursued by the State of California and
the cities
of Los Angeles and San Francisco over a listenership measurement
scheme
said to discriminate against radio stations with predominantly
African
American and Hispanic audiences. California Attorney General
Kamala
Harris, Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen A. Trutanich and San
Francisco
City Attorney Dennis Herrera alleged that Arbitron Inc.'s
implementation
of "Portable People Meters" to measure radio station listenership
in California beginning in 2008 violated the state's Unfair
Competition
Law, False Advertising Law and Unruh Civil Rights Act by
dramatically undercounting
minority audiences, causing sharp declines in advertising rates
and revenue
for many broadcasters. In deploying its new system relying on
electronic metering devices to replace personal listenership
diaries, Arbitron's
listener selection methodology inadequately reflected the
diversity of
broadcast audiences in California markets, according to the
complaint filed
in San Francisco Superior Court. The result was that of 18
stations
serving minority audiences in California, 16 experienced ratings
decreases
in excess of 30 percent under the PPM ratings scheme. One Spanish
language radio station that had previously enjoyed a number one
ranking
in the Los Angeles market saw its ratings plummet by more than 50
percent
under Arbitron's PPM ratings for September 2008, unfairly reducing
the
station's ranking to third in the overall market. Arbitron's PPM
methodology has in the past been criticized by minority
broadcasters and
the Media Ratings Council, the independent industry body that
accredits
media ratings systems. Under the terms of the settlement
filed
today, Arbitron will take multiple steps to ensure that its
ratings are
accurate and do not unfairly disadvantage minority radio stations
in California.
Arbitron has agreed to implement address based recruitment,
increase
cell phone sampling, incorporate country of origin as a standard
demographic
characteristic, and work to achieve full Media Ratings Council
accreditation
in the state. The Columbia, Md.-based media research firm has
also
agreed to pay a total of $400,000 to the plaintiffs: $150,000 each
to the
State of California and City of Los Angeles, and $100,000 to the
City and
County of San Francisco. "This settlement ensures that
California's
diverse audiences will be fully counted by Arbitron's ratings
systems and
that broadcasters serving these communities will have the
opportunity to
compete fairly in the marketplace," said Attorney General Harris.
"I am pleased that Arbitron will be revising its practices in the
state and thank my partners in this effort, City Attorneys Carmen
Trutanich
and Dennis Herrera." "Through this settlement, Arbitron
has agreed to take important steps to ensure that minority radio
stations
are reasonably treated in order that they may fairly compete in
the California
marketplace," said Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen A. Trutanich.
"In a City as diverse as Los Angeles, it is important that all of
our residents and our businesses be equally represented and able
to compete
in our field of commerce. Only then will all Californians have a
voice." "Assuring the integrity of broadcast
rating methodologies is essential to protect media outlets that
serve California's
diverse communities," said San Francisco City Attorney Dennis
Herrera.
"These measures set all-important ad rates and revenue, and
largely determine the success or failure of media outlets in a
competitive
industry. I'm grateful for the hard work and expertise of my
co-counsel
in this case, Attorney General Kamala Harris and L.A. City
Attorney Carmen
Trutanich. I am also appreciative of Arbitron and its legal team
for their cooperative approach and willingness to negotiate with
us in
good faith." The case is the People of the
State
of California v. Arbitron, Inc., San Francisco Superior
Court case
no. 519349.
|