July 10, 2007

Wi-fi concerns addressed?

Board President says modifications to mayor's proposal could sway progressives to vote for it

Heather Knight, SF Chronicle Staff Writer


Aaron Peskin, president of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors, gave
qualified support Friday to Mayor Gavin Newsom's proposal for free,
citywide Internet access -- signaling the mayor's long-delayed initiative
could finally be passed by the board with some modifications.
The Newsom administration proposed a free Wi-Fi system two years ago and
has negotiated a contract with EarthLink to provide it. The company, which
formed a partnership with Google to pursue the deal, would pay the city $2
million over four years in exchange for building, owning and maintaining a
network strung across city light poles.
Some progressive members of the board said that the contract isn't good
enough for the city and that San Francisco should consider running its own
Wi-Fi network.
Peskin said Friday that after studying the proposed contract and talking
to experts, he has decided it would be a benefit to the city -- with some
significant changes that are likely to make the plan more palatable to his
colleagues. Peskin said he is in talks with officials at EarthLink about
the proposed amendments.
"They seem willing to discuss these things," Peskin said. "With those
modifications, this will be beneficial for the city and county of San
Francisco."
Nathan Ballard, Newsom's press secretary, said he was glad that the plan
may actually become reality.
"We are pleased that Supervisor Peskin is showing leadership and moving
his colleagues on the board toward approving free Wi-Fi," he said. "It's
an idea whose time has come."
Peskin is proposing speeding up the connection for those receiving Wi-Fi
for free. Under Newsom's contract, those customers would be connected at a
slower rate of 300 kilobits per second, while those paying about $20 a
month would be connected at a faster rate of 1 megabit per second. Peskin
said the speed of the free service should be 500 kilobits per second.
He also wants to ensure that the network is operational in all parts of
the city, and that the requirement is enforceable. Some supervisors have
questioned whether the contract -- praised by Newsom as "bridging the
digital divide" between those who have Internet access and those who don't
-- would provide decent service to the southeast sector, where a
comparatively high percentage of San Franciscans lack Internet access.
Peskin said he wants to ensure the city is compensated for letting
EarthLink affix antennas to its poles. He also wants the 16-year contract
Newsom has negotiated to be shortened to eight years.
One small aspect of the Wi-Fi proposal will be before the full board on
Tuesday. In April, the city's planning department said the Wi-Fi proposal
is exempt from environmental review, a decision being appealed by a group
called the San Francisco Neighborhood Antenna-Free Union.
On Wednesday, the board's budget committee will take up the proposal as a
whole and consider Peskin's proposed amendments. It is almost certain to
be approved by the panel because three of the committee's five members --
Peskin and Supervisors Bevan Dufty and Sean Elsbernd -- have said they
will support it.
Passage is looking more likely at the full board, as well, which will take
up the matter in late July or early August, Peskin said. It would need six
votes to pass. In addition to Peskin, Dufty and Elsbernd, Supervisor
Michela Alioto-Pier has said she will support it.
Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval said Friday he is also likely to back it,
meaning the mayor needs just one more supervisor to vote in favor of it.
Several supervisors said Friday that they are wavering, but may wind up
voting in favor of the contract with Peskin's amendments.
"It's definitely heading in the right direction," said Supervisor Ross
Mirkarimi.
Supervisor Tom Ammiano said he didn't appreciate the mayor suggesting that
supervisors' concerns about the deal his administration negotiated weren't
valid. Newsom has accused supervisors who don't like his plan of playing
politics, including in a speech in February to the San Francisco Planning
and Urban Research Association when the mayor said, "I encourage the board
to look beyond their personal opinions of the guy up here and talk about
real people."
But Ammiano said he's open to hearing more about Peskin's amendments and
discussing the matter further.
"That would be helpful," he said.
Newsom, who faces no serious challengers for re-election in November, has
made free Wi-Fi a cornerstone of his campaign. Asked whether he worries
about handing the mayor a victory as campaign season heats up, Peskin said
the merits of the contract have to trump politics.
"I don't even see it in that lens," he said. "People run for office every
several years, and that shouldn't stop the board or the government from
moving forward. My job is to make sure it's a good thing for the city, and
the contract is the best contract for the city." ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2007 SF Chronicle

Posted by jeff at July 10, 2007 10:46 AM | TrackBack